Careers

Diversity

With 17 offices, from New York to Los Angeles and Seattle to Orlando, we live and work in communities all over the U.S., collaborating across locations, disciplines and even borders. Our experienced, highly ranked lawyers serve businesses wherever they are and wherever they want to go.

Offices

About Us

Pages

Professionals

Thought leadership: blogs, podcasts, videos, publications, events and news

Insights

Services

Pro Bono

Through the ADventures in Law Blog, BakerHostetler’s Advertising, Marketing and Digital Media team provides updates and analysis on issues and trends in the advertising and marketing industry.

Please visit our <a href="https://www.adventures-in-law.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">ADventures in Law Blog</a> site for more and to subscribe!

ADventures in Law

The Antitrust Advocate blog provides insights and commentary surrounding complex antitrust litigation and trade regulation. It’s presented by members of BakerHostetler’s Antitrust and Competition Team.

Please visit our <a href="https://www.antitrustadvocate.com/">Antitrust Advocate</a> blog site for more and to subscribe!

Antitrust Advocate

BakerHostetler’s Blockchain Monitor is a weekly blog curated and written by members of our Web3 and Digital Assets team. Published every Monday, the blog is dedicated to providing our clients, friends and industry contacts with a concise weekly update of key developments in the fast-paced blockchain industry. By subscribing below you will receive the blog in your email inbox every Monday afternoon.

Please visit our <a href="https://www.theblockchainmonitor.com/">Blockchain Monitor</a> blog site for more and to subscribe!

Blockchain Monitor

BakerHostetler successfully defends class actions around the country. Our team consists of seasoned class action litigators who have represented clients in state and federal courts and in multidistrict litigation in areas such as consumer fraud, securities, antitrust, ERISA, RICO, insurance and data breach.

Please visit our <a href="https://www.classactionlawsuitdefense.com/">Class Action Lawsuit Defense</a> blog site for more and to subscribe!

Class Action Lawsuit Defense

Commentary Addressing Risks and Opportunities Through the Lifecycle of Data, Technology, Advertising and Innovation.

Please visit our <a href="https://www.bakerdatacounsel.com/">Data Counsel</a> blog site for more and to subscribe!

Data Counsel

The Discovery Advocate blog is presented by members of BakerHostetler’s E-Discovery Advocacy and Management Team (EDAM).  Today’s modern discovery practice requires a practical approach backed by specialized expertise; Discovery Advocate examines the developments and trends that impact today’s litigants in the trenches of litigation and beyond.

Please visit our <a href="https://www.discoveryadvocate.com/">Discovery Advocate</a> blog site for more and to subscribe!

Discovery Advocate

BakerHostetler represents employers in a wide array of class action disputes. This blog is written by members of its Labor and Employment Group.

Please visit our <a href="https://www.employmentclassactionreport.com/">Employment Class Action</a> blog site for more and to subscribe!

Employment Class Action Blog

The Employment Law Spotlight blog is written by attorneys of our national Labor and Employment Group, with an eye toward helping employers avoid litigation.

Please visit our <a href="https://www.employmentlawspotlight.com/">Employment Law Spotlight</a> blog site for more and to subscribe!

Employment Law Spotlight

BakerHostetler is at the forefront of national law firms providing clients involved in every facet of healthcare delivery across the country with comprehensive legal counsel of remarkable responsiveness, creativity, quality and value.

Please visit our <a href="https://www.healthlawupdate.com/">Health Law Update</a> blog site for more and to subscribe!

Health Law Update

In today’s global economy, patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, domain names and other intellectual property (IP) are among the most valuable assets of market leaders and rising businesses.

Please visit our <a href="https://www.ipintelligencereport.com/">IP Intelligence Report</a> blog site for more and to subscribe!

IP Intelligence Report

Updates from Capitol Hill.

Please visit our <a href="https://www.ohioclock.com/">Ohio Clock</a> blog site for more and to subscribe!

Ohio Clock

Covering energy and environmental law, Pillar and Post will be your “catalog of record” for legal issues as law and policy careen back and forth under the influence of new ideas and enthusiasms.

Please visit our <a href="https://www.bakerenergylaw.com/">Pillar and Post</a> blog site for more and to subscribe!

Pillar and Post

The Bargaining Table blog is written by attorneys of BakerHostetler’s Labor Relations team, with an eye toward helping employers manage their unionized workforces.

Please visit our <a href="https://www.thebargainingtableblog.com/">Bargaining Table</a> blog site for more and to subscribe!

The Bargaining Table

Am Law 100 firm with practices in Business, Digital Assets and Data Management, Intellectual Property, Labor & Employment, Litigation and Tax.

Home | BakerHostetler

2024 BHIPP - BakerHostetler IP Perspective

2024 DSIR Report Deeper Dive

32nd Annual Legislative Seminar Series

33rd Annual Legislative Seminar Series

AD Nauseam

AD-ttorneys@law

The use of noncompetes is now shifting across the country. Many states are limiting the use of noncompetes. Several states have enacted or are considering prohibitions on noncompetes. Nationally, the Federal Trade Commission is engaging in a rulemaking that could ban noncompete agreements between employers and employees. What does all of this mean for your business? Are there alternatives to noncompetes that can protect your business?

To help bring all this into focus, we’ve created a three-part series called “Alternatives to Noncompetes.”

Alternatives to Noncompetes

BakerHostetler Blockchain University

BakerHosts

Celebrating Black Voices at BakerHostetler

Since the recent Dobbs decision, which overturned Roe v. Wade, companies have been impacted nationwide and have several new legal angles to consider as it relates to their employees and their businesses. With that in mind, we’ve created a new podcast series, Dobbs on Demand, designed to help you navigate this new and evolving landscape.

Dobbs on Demand

DSIR Report Deeper Dive - 2022

DSIR Report Deeper Dive - 2023

Estate and Tax Planning for Globally Mobile Clients

MDLephant: What's Big in MDL Litigation?

Promoting the Progress of Science

Rev Up!

Technology from the Top: AI, Data and the Future of Business with Today’s CIOs

The Cloakroom podcast series brings you inside Capitol Hill with insightful interviews and discussions with leading lawmakers, both Republicans and Democrats from the House and Senate. Hosted by former Congressman Peter Roskam, who leads BakerHostetler’s Federal Policy team, you’ll hear firsthand about the latest policy debates on taxes, healthcare, energy, financial services and more.
Subscribe to The Cloakroom
<a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-cloakroom-with-peter-roskam-bakerhosts/id1759425935" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Apple Podcast</a> | <a href="https://www.amazon.com/music/player/podcasts/bdb139af-518d-469a-998b-ea9b49fafd93/the-cloakroom-with-peter-roskam---bakerhosts" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Amazon Music</a> | <a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/7LfpZdBC0OA2jyVjgVXNFF?si=de8f473382704494" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Spotify</a>

The Cloakroom with Peter Roskam

The Data Economy and You

The Emerging New Era for Noncompetes and Trade Secrets

The Now and Next in International Trade

The State Tax Show

Case Tracker: Artificial Intelligence, Copyrights and Class Actions

core/button

core/buttons

core/heading

Thomson Reuters sued ROSS Intelligence in May 2020, alleging the AI/legal research company unlawfully copied content from Thomson Reuter’s legal research platform Westlaw for the purpose of training its AI-based platform. Both parties filed motions for summary judgment – ROSS arguing that it made fair use of the Westlaw material and Thomson Reuters arguing that ROSS unauthorizedly used Westlaw Content material to build a direct competitor to Westlaw.

core/paragraph

Opposition briefs to the renewed motions for summary judgment are due October 30, with reply briefs due November 13.

Case Background

Caption: Thomson Reuters Enter. Centre GmbH et al v. ROSS Intelligence Inc., 1:20-cv-00613-SB

Court: District of Delaware

Thomson Reuters – Thomson Reuters Enterprise Centre GmbH and West Publishing Corporation, represented by Morris, Nichols, Arsht &amp; Tunnell LLP and Kirkland &amp; Ellis LLP

ROSS – ROSS Intelligence Inc., represented by Potter Anderson &amp; Corroon LLP, DLA Piper LLP (U.S.) and Crowell &amp; Moring LLP

contentpilot/accordion

Status Updates

Oct. 1, 2024 – Parties renewed their motions for summary judgment

Sept. 27, 2024 – Court resolved antitrust summary judgment motions

Aug. 22, 2024 – Trial continued and parties invited to renew summary judgment motions

Aug. 20, 2024 – The court schedules additional briefing

August 8, 2024 – Court declines to filter headnotes as uncopyrightable

July 18, 2024 – The Court ordered filtration hearing 

July 15, 2024 – Pretrial conference scheduled for August 6, 2024 

July 12, 2024 – Reuters filed brief in opposition of motion for filtration hearing 

June 14, 2024 – ROSS filed motion for the setting of a filtration hearing 

June 12, 2024 – Defendant requested filtration hearing.  

Oct. 26, 2023 – Plaintiff filed replies in support of antitrust counterclaims motion for summary judgment 

Oct. 23, 2023 – Trial on the copyright issues set for August 26, 2024 

Oct. 9, 2023 – Parties met and conferred about trial

Sept. 28, 2023 – Defendant filed oppositions to plaintiffs’ antitrust/anticompetition summary judgment motions

Sept. 25, 2023 – Court denied parties’ motions for summary judgment

Aug. 31, 2023 – Plaintiffs filed four motions for summary judgment on defendant’s antitrust counterclaims

Feb. 13, 2023 – Plaintiffs filed replies in support of their summary judgment

Jan. 30, 2023 – Plaintiffs filed oppositions to defendant’s summary judgment motions

Jan. 30, 2023 – Defendant filed oppositions to plaintiffs’ summary judgment motions

Dec. 22, 2022 – Defendant filed two motions for summary judgment on tortious interference with contract claim and affirmative defense of fair use

Dec. 22, 2022 – Plaintiffs filed three motions for partial summary judgment on copyright infringement, tortious interference and no fair use

Oct. 6, 2022 – Plaintiffs filed answer to defendant’s second amended counterclaims

Sept. 14, 2022 – Defendant filed second amended answer and amended counterclaims against plaintiffs

April 26, 2022 – Court granted in part and denied in part plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss counterclaims

May 13, 2021 – Plaintiffs filed reply in support of their motion to dismiss

April 26, 2021 – Plaintiffs filed renewed motion to dismiss counterclaims

April 22, 2021 – Defendant filed opposition to plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss counterclaims

April 12, 2021 – Defendant amended answer and counterclaims

March 29, 2021 – Court denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint

March 25, 2021 – Plaintiffs filed motion to dismiss amended counterclaims

Jan. 25, 2021 – Defendant amended its answer and counterclaims

Jan. 4, 2021 – Plaintiffs filed answer to defendant’s counterclaims

Dec. 13, 2020 – Defendant filed partial answer with counterclaims

Dec. 13, 2020 – Defendant withdrew motion to dismiss for one cause of action

Aug. 10, 2020 – Plaintiffs filed opposition to defendant’s motion to dismiss

July 13, 2020 – Defendant filed motion to dismiss

May 6, 2020 – Plaintiffs filed complaint 

core/group

Select Court Documents

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ECF-1-Complaint.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">May 6, 2020 – ECF 1 Complaint</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ECF-1112-Motion-to-Dismiss.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">July 13, 2020 – ECF 11, 12 ROSS Motion to Dismiss Complaint</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ECF-15-Opposition-to-Motion-to-Dismiss.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Aug. 10, 2020 – ECF 15 Opposition to [12] ROSS Motion to Dismiss</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ECF-17-ROSS-Reply-ISO-Motion-to-Dismiss.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Aug. 20, 2020 – ECF 17 ROSS Reply ISO [12] Motion to Dismiss</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ECF-21-Answer.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Dec. 13, 2020 – ECF 21 ROSS Answer and Counterclaims</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ECF-22-ROSS-Withdrawal-Motion-to-Dismiss.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Dec. 13, 2020 – ECF 22 ROSS Partial Withdrawal of [12] Motion to Dismiss</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ECF-23-Answer-to-Counterclaims.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jan. 4, 2021 – ECF 23 Thomson Reuters Answer to [21] ROSS Counterclaim</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ECF-24-ROSS-First-Amended-Answer.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jan. 25, 2021 – ECF 24 ROSS Amended Answer and Amended Counterclaim</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ECF-27-28-Thomson-Reuters-Motion-to-Dismiss-Counterclaims.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">March 25, 2021 – ECF 27, 28 Thomson Reuters Motion to Dismiss</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ECF-31-ROSS-Motion-to-Dismiss-Denied.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">March 29, 2021 – ECF 31 Opinion on [12] ROSS Motion to Dismiss</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ECF-34-Joint-Status-Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">April 5, 2021 – ECF 34 Joint Status Report</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ECF-36-ROSS-Second-Amended-Answer.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">April 12, 2021 – ECF 36 ROSS Amended Answer and Amended Counterclaim</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ECF-38-Opposition-to-Motion-to-Dismiss-Counterclaim.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">April 22, 2021 – ECF 38 ROSS Opposition to [27] Thomson Reuters Motion to Dismiss</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ECF-39-Amended-Motion-to-Dismiss-Counterclaims.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">April 26, 2021 – ECF 39 Thomson Reuters Renewed Motion to Dismiss</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ECF-45-Reply-ISO-Motion-to-Dismiss.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">May 13, 2021 – ECF 45 Thomson Reuters Reply ISO [39] Thomson Reuters Motion to Dismiss</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ECF-170-Memorandum-Opinion-Motion-to-Dismiss.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">April 26, 2022 – ECF 170, 171 Opinion on [39] Thomson Reuters Motion to Dismiss</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ECF-225-ROSS-Third-Amended-Answer.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Sept. 14, 2022 – ECF 225 ROSS Second Amended Answer</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ECF-234-Amended-Answer-to-Counterclaims.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Oct. 6, 2022 – ECF 234 Thomson Reuters Answer to [225] ROSS Second Amended Counterclaims</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ECF-249-295-Thomson-Reuters-Motion-for-Summary-Judgment-Count-1.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Dec. 22, 2022 – ECF 249, 295 Thomson Reuters Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Copyright Infringement (Complaint Count 1)</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ECF-251-296-Thomson-Reuters-Motion-for-Summary-Judgment-Count-2.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Dec. 22, 2022 – ECF 251, 296 Thomson Reuters Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Tortious Interference with Contract and Copyright Preemption (Complaint Count 2)</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ECF-253-297-Thomson-Reuters-Motion-for-Summary-Judgment.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Dec. 22, 2022 – ECF 253, 297 Thomson Reuters Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Fair Use and Other Defenses</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ECF-269-286-ROSS-Motion-for-Summary-Judgment-Count-2.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Dec. 22, 2022 – ECF 269, 286 ROSS Motion for Summary Judgment on Tortious Interference with Contract Claim (Complaint Count 2)</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ECF-271-287-ROSS-Motion-for-Summary-Judgment-Count-1.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Dec. 22, 2022 – ECF 271, 287 ROSS Motion for Summary Judgment on Affirmative Defense of Fair Use (Complaint Count 1)</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ECF-329-Thomson-Reuters-Opposition-to-Motion-for-Summary-Judgment.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jan. 30, 2023 – ECF 329 Thomson Reuters Opposition to [286] Motion for Summary Judgment</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ECF-330-Thomson-Reuters-Opposition-to-Motion-for-Summary-Judgment.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jan. 30, 2023 – ECF 330 Thomson Reuters Opposition to [287] Motion for Summary Judgment</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ECF-334-ROSS-Opposition-to-Motion-for-Summary-Judgment.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jan. 30, 2023 – ECF 334 ROSS Opposition to [295] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ECF-335-ROSS-Opposition-to-Motion-for-Summary-Judgment.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jan. 30, 2023 – ECF 335 ROSS Opposition to [296] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ECF-339-ROSS-Opposition-to-Motion-for-Summary-Judgment.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jan. 30, 2023 – ECF 339 ROSS Opposition to [297] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ECF-368-Thomson-Reuters-Reply-ISO-Motion-for-Summary-Judgment.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Feb. 13, 2023 – ECF 368 Thomson Reuters Reply ISO [295] Motion for Summary Judgment</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ECF-369-Thomson-Reuters-Reply-ISO-Motion-for-Summary-Judgment.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Feb. 13, 2023 – ECF 369 Thomson Reuters Reply ISO [296] Motion for Summary Judgment</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ECF-370-Thomson-Reuters-Reply-ISO-Motion-for-Summary-Judgment.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Feb. 13, 2023 – ECF 370 Thomson Reuters Reply ISO [297] Motion for Summary Judgment</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ECF-376-ROSS-Reply-ISO-Motion-for-Summary-Judgment.pdf">Feb. 13, 2023 – ECF 376 ROSS Reply ISO [286] Motion for Summary Judgment</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ECF-377-ROSS-Reply-ISO-Motion-for-Summary-Judgment.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Feb. 13, 2023 – ECF 377 ROSS Reply ISO [287] Motion for Summary Judgment</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ECF-519-538-Motion-for-Summary-Judgment-Counterclaims.pdf">Aug. 31, 2023 – ECF 519, 538 Thomson Reuters Motion for Summary Judgment on Antitrust Counterclaims – Separate Products</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ECF-521-539-Motion-for-Summary-Judgment-Counterclaims.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Aug. 31, 2023 – ECF 521, 539 Thomson Reuters Motion for Summary Judgment on Antitrust Counterclaims – Market Definition and Power</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ECF-523-540-Motion-for-Summary-Judgment-Counterclaims.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Aug. 31, 2023 – ECF 523, 540 Thomson Reuters Motion for Summary Judgment on Antitrust Counterclaims – Statute of Limitations</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ECF-523-540-Motion-for-Summary-Judgment-Counterclaims.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Aug. 31, 2023 – ECF 525, 541 Thomson Reuters Motion for Summary Judgment on Antitrust Counterclaims – Injunctive Relief</a>

<a>Sept. 25, 2023 – ECF 548, 547 Court Order and Opinion on Motions for Summary Judgment</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ECF-550-Court-Order.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Sept. 25, 2023 – ECF 550, 549 Court Order and Opinion on Motions to Exclude Opinions and Testimony</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ECF-573-ROSS-Opposition-to-Motion-for-Summary-Judgment.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Sept. 28, 2023 – ECF 573 ROSS Opposition to [539] Motion for Summary Judgment</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ECF-574-ROSS-Opposition-to-Motion-for-Summary-Judgment.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Sept. 28, 2023 – ECF 574 ROSS Opposition to [538] Motion for Summary Judgment</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ECF-575-ROSS-Opposition-to-Motion-for-Summary-Judgment.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Sept. 28, 2023 – ECF 575 ROSS Opposition to [540] Motion for Summary Judgment</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ECF-576-ROSS-Opposition-to-Motion-for-Summary-Judgment.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Sept. 28, 2023 – ECF 576 ROSS Opposition to [541] Motion for Summary Judgment</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ECF-566-Joint-Submission.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Oct. 9, 2023 – ECF 566 Joint Submission Regarding Trial</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/ECF-592-Reuters-Reply-ISO.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Oct. 26, 2023 – ECF 592 Reuters Reply ISO [519] Motion for Summary Judgment&nbsp;</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/ECF-593-Reuters-Reply-ISO.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Oct. 26, 2023 – ECF 593 Reuters Reply ISO [521] Motion for Summary Judgment&nbsp;</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/ECF-594-Reuters-Reply-ISO.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Oct. 26, 2023 – ECF 594 Reuters Reply ISO [523] Motion for Summary Judgment&nbsp;</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/ECF-595-Reuters-Reply-ISO.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Oct. 26, 2023 – ECF 595 Reuters Reply ISO [525] Motion for Summary Judgment</a>&nbsp;

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/601-Letter-Requesting-Filtration-Hearing.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">June 12, 2024 – ECF 601 Defendant Letter Requesting Filtration Hearing</a>&nbsp;

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/June-14-2024-–-ECF-603-and-608-Ross-Motion-for-the-Setting-of-a-Filtration-Hearing.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">June 14, 2024 – ECF 603 and 608 ROSS Motion for the Setting of a Filtration Hearing</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/610-Plaintiffs-Opp-to-Defendants-Mt-for-the-Setting-of-a-Filtration-Hearing.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">July 12, 2024 – ECF 610 Thomson Reuters’ Opposition to Motion for Filtration Hearing</a>

<a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/669-Memorandum-Opinion-signed-by-Judge-Bibas.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Sept. 27, 2024 – ECF 669 Order Denying Resolving Antitrust Counterclaims on Summary Judgment</a>