Careers

Diversity

With 17 offices, from New York to Los Angeles and Seattle to Orlando, we live and work in communities all over the U.S., collaborating across locations, disciplines and even borders. Our experienced, highly ranked lawyers serve businesses wherever they are and wherever they want to go.

Offices

About Us

Pages

Professionals

Thought leadership: blogs, podcasts, videos, publications, events and news

Insights

Services

Pro Bono

Am Law 100 firm with practices in Business, Digital Assets and Data Management, Intellectual Property, Labor & Employment, Litigation and Tax.

Home | BakerHostetler

Ohio Clock

Hallway with a grandfather clock displayed

Congress Faces Pre-election Budget Vote to Avoid Government Shutdown

Senate Passes Kids Online Safety Measure But House Passage Unclear

Current State of U.S. Economic Sanctions Imposed in Response to Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine – August 29, 2024

Current State of U.S. Export Controls in Response to the Russian Federation’s Invasion of Ukraine – August 29, 2024

Partners Andreas Kaltsounis and Nichole Sterling authored an Aug. 4 <a href="https://admin.bakerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Law360-4-New-State-Geofencing-Bans-And-How-They-Differ.pdf">Law360 article</a> about new “geofencing bans” that are taking effect in four states – Connecticut, Nevada, New York and Washington. These laws limit spatial and location tech around facilities that provide certain healthcare services to prevent people from being identified (or their private information collected and/or shared) when they use those facilities.

core/paragraph

According to the article, these laws vary widely, with each presenting unique compliance challenges. The authors caution that “organizations using geofencing tools in these four states should evaluate their exposure to these laws to reduce potential regulatory and litigation risks.”

State laws limiting geolocation tech around health centers pose compliance challenges

Featured Insights

Related Services

Featured Insights