Careers

Diversity

With 17 offices, from New York to Los Angeles and Seattle to Orlando, we live and work in communities all over the U.S., collaborating across locations, disciplines and even borders. Our experienced, highly ranked lawyers serve businesses wherever they are and wherever they want to go.

Offices

About Us

Pages

Professionals

Thought leadership: blogs, podcasts, videos, publications, events and news

Insights

Services

Pro Bono

Am Law 100 firm with practices in Business, Digital Assets and Data Management, Intellectual Property, Labor & Employment, Litigation and Tax.

Home | BakerHostetler

Unless You Are the State of Texas As An Employer, Salary Changes to the Department of Labor’s (DOL) Overtime Rule Took Effect Today

Antitrust Advocate

DOJ Still Contemplating Criminal No-Poach Cases

Fernando Bohorquez, Aaron Goodman, Kathryn Prince Author Article on PETs for Interactive Advertising Bureau

2024 ADventures in Law CLE Webinar Series: Is it a Claim or is it Puffery?

California’s Office of Health Care Affordability (OHCA) released a set of <a href="https://hcai.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Proposed-Text-for-CMIR-Package-2024-05-1.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">proposed revisions</a> to its sweeping Cost & Market Impact Review (CMIR) regulations yesterday afternoon. The proposed edits reflect a few lessons learned in OHCA’s first five months of implementing the CMIR regulations and hint at some of the potential ongoing discussions between OHCA and material change transaction notice (MCN) submitters whose notices are not yet “deemed complete” and have not been publicly posted.

core/paragraph

core/heading

OHCA proposes to limit the use of the defined term “affiliation” to certain sections of the CMIR regulations and otherwise leaves the term “affiliate” undefined. 

core/list-item

OHCA proposes to broaden its net to capture more transactions, including:

core/list

OHCA proposes to switch out the term “health care entity” for “provider or fully integrated delivery system” in a few sections of the regulations.

OHCA offers a newer, shorter definition of “annual California-derived revenue” (defined to be “revenue from the provision of health care services in California”) – but only to be used in certain sections.

OHCA proposes the addition of a burden on submitters to exercise “reasonable diligence” to obtain the information required in an MCN.

OHCA proposes new language to allow submitters to withdraw certain information if a request for confidential treatment has been denied.

What could be the effect?

OHCA’s proposed change to include transactions where a health care entity is merely the “subject” of a transaction could be the result of its review of its first MCN “deemed complete,” which involves a skilled nursing facility. Consider a transaction in which the parties include a facility operator and a landlord, but not the facility itself. However, this change introduces a new host of questions on what it means to be the “subject” of a transaction. OHCA attempts to clarify by adding that “[b]eing the subject of a transaction means the transaction … concerns a health care entity’s assets, control, responsibility, governance, or operations, in whole or in part.” But what does it mean to “concern” another entity’s assets, control, responsibility, governance or operations? Does the transaction document merely need to reference a health care entity in passing? Or must the health care entity be the central focus and driving purpose of the transaction?

What do these changes hint about current MCNs?

To date, OHCA has only posted one “deemed complete” MCN. However, some of OHCA’s proposed edits suggest ongoing conversations with other potential submitters, including questions on what to do if an entity is not able to obtain all of the information listed in § 97438, and how far an entity must go to obtain these materials.

Other nonpublic discussions with submitters likely involve confidentiality. Notably, OHCA has proposed language that would allow a submitter to request to withdraw information if OHCA denies a requested confidentiality designation. However, OHCA has not clarified whether or how such request would be granted, whether OHCA would retain a copy of the withdrawn information, and what such withdrawal would mean for the submitter’s MCN and reaching “deemed complete” status. In any case, submitters may reasonably assume that such information could still be disclosed to the California Attorney General’s office, as discussed in § 97438(d)(4).

Recall that OHCA’s authorizing statute permits OHCA to adopt effectuating regulations on an emergency basis until Jan. 1, 2027 – so expect changes to happen quickly.

OHCA will discuss the proposed revisions at the Health Care Affordability Board’s next meeting, on <a href="https://hcai.ca.gov/public-meetings/may-health-care-affordability-board-meeting-2/?utm_source=General+Subscription&utm_campaign=b5ff377367-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2024_05_15_09_10&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_-b5ff377367-%5BLIST_EMAIL_ID%5D" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Wednesday, May 22</a>.

OHCA will accept public comments until May 30.

After public comment, OHCA must submit the proposed regulations to California’s Office of Administrative Law (OAL).<a href="#_ftn1" id="_ftnref1">[1]</a>

core/separator

<a href="#_ftnref1" id="_ftn1">[1]</a> Be aware that the regulations released by the OAL may vary slightly from the regulations submitted by OHCA, as seen this past winter, when the final CMIR regulations became effective on Dec. 18, 2023.

OHCA Proposes Material Updates to CMIR Regulations

Featured Insights

Related Services

Featured Insights