Careers

Diversity

With 17 offices, from New York to Los Angeles and Seattle to Orlando, we live and work in communities all over the U.S., collaborating across locations, disciplines and even borders. Our experienced, highly ranked lawyers serve businesses wherever they are and wherever they want to go.

Offices

About Us

Pages

Professionals

Thought leadership: blogs, podcasts, videos, publications, events and news

Insights

Services

Pro Bono

Am Law 100 firm with practices in Business, Digital Assets and Data Management, Intellectual Property, Labor & Employment, Litigation and Tax.

Home | BakerHostetler

ADventures in Law

Supreme Court Overrules ‘Chevron’ Deference to Agencies

Leigh Zeiser Presents Generative Intelligence Foundations to AALL Members

Carlos Ortiz Participates on Panel at 16th Annual Tax Controversy Forum

Jeff Paravano, Andrew Grossman Discuss Implications of Moore on Taxing Issues Webcast

<figure class="wp-block-image alignright size-large is-resized"><img decoding="async" src="https://laborrelations.bakerhostetlerblogs.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/36/2022/12/Hands-holding-cash-currency-close-up-GettyImages-504040328_1200x630-662x348.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-6318" width="428"/></figure>



“You get more remedies! You get more remedies! Everybody gets more remedies!”



Employers found to have committed an unfair labor practice (ULP) now may be required to compensate employees for interest and late fees on credit cards, penalties for early withdrawals from retirement accounts, out-of-pocket medical expenses, and other costs incurred to make ends meet. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or Board) recently held that employers must compensate employees for all direct or foreseeable pecuniary harms suffered as a result of the employer’s ULP. Thryv, Inc., 372 NLRB No. 22 (issued Dec. 13, 2022).



In Thryv, Inc., the employer unilaterally decided to lay off six employees. The Board found that this layoff was unlawful because the employer failed to negotiate with the union to impasse. But what really stood out was the NLRB’s decision on remedies. Historically, when the Board has decided that an employee was wrongfully terminated, employers could expect the Board to order an employee’s reinstatement to their previous or equivalent position and compensation for lost earnings and benefits. The Board, however, now expanded the remedies available to include all foreseeable pecuniary harms resulting from a ULP. The Board noted that its decision is based on the “make whole” principles of the National Labor Relations Act, which in the Board’s view may include compensation for incurring out-of-pocket medical expenses, credit card debt and other significant financial costs as a result of an unlawful layoff or other ULP.



In the wake of the NLRB’s decision, employers face uncertainty as to how far the link between the ULP and the employee’s loss will extend. For example, if an employee whom the Board finds was unlawfully terminated cannot make their credit card payment, accumulates interest and late fees, and damages their credit score, will the employer now be responsible for not only the interest and late fees but also the cost of restoring the employee’s credit score? Or, if an employee whom the Board finds was unlawfully terminated cannot pay their rent and expends legal fees defending the eviction, will the employer now be responsible for the late rent fees, legal fees for defending the eviction, and any child care costs that resulted from the time the employee spent fighting the eviction? Only time will tell, but going forward, employers need to be aware of their increased potential exposure when considering taking personnel actions that might result in a ULP charge.

core/freeform

The Bargaining Table

NLRB Gifts Employees Expansive Remedies in Time for the Holiday Season

Featured Insights