Careers

Diversity

With 18 offices, from New York to Los Angeles and Seattle to Orlando, we live and work in communities all over the U.S., collaborating across locations, disciplines and even borders. Our experienced, highly ranked lawyers serve businesses wherever they are and wherever they want to go.

Offices

About Us

Pages

Professionals

Thought leadership: blogs, podcasts, videos, publications, events and news

Insights

Services

Pro Bono

Am Law 100 firm with practices in Business, Digital Assets and Data Management, Intellectual Property, Labor & Employment, Litigation and Tax.

Home | BakerHostetler

Peter Roskam Addresses Expiring Tax Benefits in Agenda Article

ADventures in Law

Complying with the Mail Order Rule and Satisfaction Guarantees: Poor Customer Service Can Cost Millions

2024 DSIR Report Deeper Dive

2024 DSIR Deeper Dive: Preserving Ephemeral Messaging – Capture Data Before Its Ghosts Haunt Your Compliance

Carlos Ramos-Mrosovsky, Paul Levine Contribute Article to Transatlantic Law Journal

Carl Hittinger co-authored with the Honorable Louis C. Bechtle an article for Bloomberg BNA, entitled "Antitrust Plaintiffs' Use of Federal Rule of Evidence 803(3) to Prove Causation and Damages: Revisiting Callahan and Stelwagon." The piece outlines the use of evidence in civil pleadings, discussing the differences between guidelines established by Twombly and Iqbal with those set by Callahan and Stelwagon, which allow plaintiffs to meet the burden of proof necessary more readily, "but also provide opportunities for defendants to successfully challenge plaintiffs' evidence." Hittinger outlines both Callahan and Stelwagon, summarizing their impact on future cases. He concludes by stating that the Third Circuit has not yet revisited the provisions set forth in Callahan and Stelwagon, though they set a precedent that plaintiffs must prove amount of damages and defeat evidence of plausible alternative explanations of loss or of defendants' behaviors in order to survive reversal. The article was also published in The Legal Intelligencer on December 7, 2009.

core/freeform

Philadelphia

Washington, D.C.

Partner

Carl W. Hittinger

Antitrust and Competition

Hittinger Coauthors “Antitrust Plaintiffs’ Use of Federal Rule of Evidence 803(3) to Prove Causation and Damages: Revisiting Callahan and Stelwagon” for Bloomberg BNA

Related Services

Featured Insights