Careers

Diversity

With 18 offices, from New York to Los Angeles and Seattle to Orlando, we live and work in communities all over the U.S., collaborating across locations, disciplines and even borders. Our experienced, highly ranked lawyers serve businesses wherever they are and wherever they want to go.

Offices

About Us

Pages

Professionals

Thought leadership: blogs, podcasts, videos, publications, events and news

Insights

Services

Pro Bono

Am Law 100 firm with practices in Business, Digital Assets and Data Management, Intellectual Property, Labor & Employment, Litigation and Tax.

Home | BakerHostetler

Enforcement of U.S. Tariffs Abroad: The Impact on Defense and NATSEC Companies

Sara Goldstein Speaks on “Fireside Chat with a Cybersecurity Defense Attorney” at GPSEC

Theodore Kobus, Craig Hoffman Named to Cybersecurity Docket’s Incident Response 50 for 7th and 3rd Time, Respectively

ADventures in Law

Not to Change the Subject (Line) … but Email Marketers May Want to Take Note of a Recent Washington Supreme Court Ruling

core/heading

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) remains focused on “rooting out and prosecuting unfair labor-market practices that harm American workers.”

core/list-item

The FTC will implement an internal Joint Labor Task Force (Task Force), comprised of representatives from the Bureau of Competition, Bureau of Consumer Protection, Bureau of Economics, and Office of Policy Planning to accomplish these goals.

The scope of potential unfair practices subject to the Task Force’s scrutiny are broad, including noncompete, no-poach and no-hire agreements, but also alleged harmful occupational licensing requirements and “job scams.”<a id="_msocom_1"></a>

core/list

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) will continue its focus on “unfair” competition in the labor markets – including the use of noncompete, no-poach and no-hire agreements – albeit with a seemingly more targeted approach than was pursued under the prior administration. In fact, by some reports, newly appointed FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson stated that addressing unfair competition in the labor markets is “going to be one of the top priorities of the Trump-Vance FTC.” Consistent with this and Chairman Ferguson’s assertions during the Biden administration that the FTC was “wise to focus its resources on <a href="https://www.bakerlaw.com/insights/ftc-announces-action-against-no-hire-provisions-used-by-building-services-contractor/">protecting competition in labor markets</a>,” he issued a <a href="https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/memorandum-chairman-ferguson-re-labor-task-force-2025-02-26.pdf">memorandum </a>on February 26, 2025, instructing “the FTC’s Bureau of Competition, Bureau of Consumer Protection, Bureau of Economics, and Office of Policy Planning to work together to prioritize rooting out and prosecuting unfair labor-market practices that harm American workers.” The FTC’s Bureaus were directed to form an internal Joint Labor Task Force (Task Force), which will meet “at least monthly” to assess “all ongoing labor matters” and report quarterly to Chaiman Ferguson.&nbsp;

core/paragraph

The list of potential harms that the FTC claims fall within the Task Force’s purview, and which will be scrutinized, is broad. Examples provided by the FTC include <a href="https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/2410029-planned-building-ferguson-concurrence-redacted.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">no-poach, non-solicitation or no-hire agreements</a>, which, along with <a href="https://www.bakerlaw.com/insights/stop-the-notices-to-employees-ftc-noncompete-rule-vacated-nationwide/">noncompetition agreements</a> (also on the FTC’s list) have recently been targeted by the FTC and the Department of Justice. But the list also includes other topics that may suggest an expansion of the FTC’s review, particularly in response to the current political climate and labor market changes over the past years, such as “collusion or unlawful coordination on DEI metrics,” “harming gig economy workers,” “misleading franchise offerings,” “harmful occupational licensing requirements” and “job scams.”

Federal agencies during the first Trump administration demonstrated a willingness to investigate and prosecute novel and aggressive antitrust-related matters, including using the antitrust laws as a creative tool to enforce the administration’s views on the labor markets. Given that President Trump’s first administration prioritized and advanced labor-related investigations significantly, this current approach is not surprising and is consistent with what employers saw in 2017-2021. Further, according to Chairman Ferguson, “[t]he American people elected President Trump in no small part to fix the economic pain they are feeling under the current labor market” and the FTC, which has a “dual consumer-protection and competition mandate [is] therefore . . . uniquely well-suited to address these worker harms . . . .” Time will tell which of the alleged harmful practices will garner the most attention, and attempted enforcement, by the FTC and its Task Force. Until then, employers should continue to focus on federal agencies’ guidance and stated priorities, as well as applicable state and local laws, to ensure they are prepared for labor market scrutiny.

FTC Launches Task Force To Investigate and Prosecute ‘Unfair’ No-Poach, Noncompetes and Other Labor-Market Practices

Featured Insights

Related Services

Featured Insights