Careers

Diversity

With 17 offices, from New York to Los Angeles and Seattle to Orlando, we live and work in communities all over the U.S., collaborating across locations, disciplines and even borders. Our experienced, highly ranked lawyers serve businesses wherever they are and wherever they want to go.

Offices

About Us

Pages

Professionals

Thought leadership: blogs, podcasts, videos, publications, events and news

Insights

Services

Pro Bono

Am Law 100 firm with practices in Business, Digital Assets and Data Management, Intellectual Property, Labor & Employment, Litigation and Tax.

Home | BakerHostetler

What to Expect and How to Prepare: A Guide to Employing Foreign Workers in the Age of Trump

Teresa Goody Guillén Supports New SEC Nominee in Institutional Investor Article

Carolina Alonso Shares Her Journey to the Legal Profession with High School Students

​Bill Bergmann Elected Treasurer of Court of Federal Claims Bar Association; Continues Role on Advisory Council

Educational institutions have not been excluded from the ransomware epidemic, and stakeholder communications are critical to an effective response. In a typical double-extortion ransomware attack, threat actors demand that victims pay a ransom to decrypt systems and to prevent publication of stolen data. However, with <a href="https://www.coveware.com/blog/2023/1/19/improved-security-and-backups-result-in-record-low-number-of-ransomware-payments">a decline in the</a><a href="https://www.coveware.com/blog/2023/1/19/improved-security-and-backups-result-in-record-low-number-of-ransomware-payments" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> </a><a href="https://www.coveware.com/blog/2023/1/19/improved-security-and-backups-result-in-record-low-number-of-ransomware-payments">number of victims choosing to pay a ransom</a>, threat actors are trying different approaches. Post-attack harassment of victims’ students, employees, board members, donors or other stakeholders was once an outlier pressure tactic but appears to be on the rise among some ransomware gangs, and <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/security/ransomware-hackers-take-demands-directly-college-students-s-sad-day-rcna61253">it is </a><a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/security/ransomware-hackers-take-demands-directly-college-students-s-sad-day-rcna61253" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">often </a><a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/security/ransomware-hackers-take-demands-directly-college-students-s-sad-day-rcna61253">directed toward victims in the education sector, such as universities/colleges and school districts</a>. Increasingly, threat actors contact their victims’ students, employees or others to expose details about the attack in an effort to force a ransom payment. For educational institutions, this growing trend highlights the importance of promptly providing clear, consistent messaging to ensure that they can frame, if not control, the narrative about the incident.   



Threat actors may contact students and employees using contact information found in the files stolen from an institution’s servers to try to coerce the educational institution to pay a ransom. In these communications, a threat actor may claim to have taken a large amount of sensitive data from the institution. The threat actor may assert that they will publish the data online because the school does not care enough about its students to protect the information. This tactic is designed to pressure a ransom payment by creating a panic within the institution’s community as recipients begin questioning administrators and other personnel about the incident or posting about these messages on social media.



Educational institutions, like any ransomware victims, cannot control what a threat actor will do. But there are measures they can take to be well positioned to mitigate the impact of this kind of threat actor harassment.



As an initial matter, providing clear, accurate messaging to students, parents, employees and other community members puts an educational institution in the best position to avoid negative fallout. When, for example, a student first learns of an incident through an email from a threat actor claiming their personal information will be published to the dark web, they may perceive their school as lacking transparency and might distrust any reactive messages the school publishes. Educational institutions that communicate promptly and proactively with their communities to share information about what happened in the attack and what they are doing in response may be inoculated against the negative effects of such harassment.  



Of course, the timing and accuracy of messaging are keys to maintaining the community’s trust. And rushing a message light on details can undermine confidence if there are questions that cannot be answered. Vague or inaccurate messages downplaying an incident can be similarly damaging. For example, a victim that communicates that student personal information is not impacted would quickly lose their constituents’ faith if a threat actor emails files or images showing that student data was involved. Initial messaging identifying known facts followed by periodic updates can help reassure the community, prevent administrators from being overwhelmed by questions, and serve as a buffer against incomplete or incorrect social media narratives.



The growing possibility that a threat actor may act out by harassing members of a college, university or school district community underscores the need to move quickly and decisively when investigating and communicating about an incident. Proactively engaging with the community to provide accurate messaging about the incident and response efforts can help build trust, demonstrate a commitment to transparency and reduce the negative effects of such harassment. Educational institutions should develop their strategies for internal and external messaging and communications early in the incident response process and keep these strategies updated as their efforts progress. Outlines and sample messages can even be incorporated into an incident response plan. These messages can be tested and refined in tabletop and other incident readiness exercises. Educational institutions that are able to quickly determine what the message will be, who will deliver it, and when and how it will be sent are likely to be well positioned to stay ahead of threat actors that try to pressure ransom payments by harassing their communities.

For Educational Institutions, Post-Ransomware Harassment Requires A+ Messaging

Featured Insights

Related Services

Featured Insights